Digital Financial Inclusion and Corporate Financing Constraints: An Empirical Investigation of Regional Digitization Heterogeneity
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202614317
Author(s)
Jingyi Zhou
Affiliation(s)
International Business School, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, Liaoning, China
*Corresponding author
Abstract
Within the broader context of rapid digital economic expansion and the structural transformation of financial services, the capacity of digital financial inclusion to ease corporate capital access constraints has emerged as a significant concern in contemporary finance scholarship. Drawing on a panel dataset constructed from Chinese A-share non-financial listed firms for the period 2015–2019 and 2021, this study examines how digital financial inclusion shapes corporate financing behavior while simultaneously incorporating regional digitization heterogeneity to explore the channels through which such effects operate, the structural variation in outcomes, and the threshold conditions that govern effectiveness. The empirical findings reveal that digital financial inclusion broadly functions to reduce firms' financing barriers—yet this reduction is neither automatic nor uniformly distributed. Its impact is primarily mediated by three pathways: enhanced informational transparency, lower transaction-related borrowing costs, and improved credit accessibility. Structurally, state-owned enterprises capture measurably greater benefits compared with privately held firms, suggesting that digital finance expansion does not dismantle entrenched credit allocation hierarchies or overturn existing patterns of resource distribution. Furthermore, the regional intensity of digitization constitutes a binding boundary condition for realizing the benefits of digital financial inclusion, exhibiting pronounced threshold nonlinearity: only once a region's digital infrastructure surpasses a critical threshold value do the constraint-alleviating properties of digital finance become more comprehensively activated. Taken together, the findings underscore that digital financial inclusion does not function as a context-independent instrument; its practical efficacy is contingent on the joint advancement of digital finance development, regional digitization, and improvements in the corporate credit environment.
Keywords
Digital Financial Inclusion; Financing Constraints; Regional Digitization Heterogeneity; Transmission Mechanisms; Threshold Effects
References
[1] Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombović, A., & Puri, M. (2020). On the rise of FinTechs: Credit scoring using digital footprints. Review of Financial Studies, 33(7), 2845–2897.
[2] Bollaert, H., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021). Fintech and access to finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68, 101941.
[3] Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3–43.
[4] Akerman, A., Gaarder, I., & Mogstad, M. (2015). The skill complementarity of broadband internet. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1781–1824.
[5] Boot, A. W. A., Hoffmann, P., Laeven, L., & Ratnovski, L. (2021). Fintech: What's old, what's new? Journal of Financial Stability, 53, 100836.
[6] Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C. (2018). Do fintech lenders penetrate areas that are underserved by traditional banks? Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 43–54.
[7] Fuster, A., Plosser, M., Schnabl, P., & Vickery, J. (2019). The role of technology in mortgage lending. Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1854–1899.
[8] Lu, Z., Wu, J., & Liu, H. (2022). Local bank, digital financial inclusion and SME financing constraints. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(6), 1712–1725.
[9] Li, J., Wei, R., & Guo, Y. (2023). How can the financing constraints of SMEs be eased in China? Effect analysis, heterogeneity test, and mechanism identification based on digital inclusive finance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1046903.
[10] Huang, Z., Tao, Y., Luo, X., Ye, Y., & Lei, T. (2023). Regional digital finance and corporate investment efficiency in China. Applied Economics, 55(43), 5115–5134.
[11] Iyer, R., Khwaja, A. I., Luttmer, E. F. P., & Shue, K. (2016). Screening peers softly: Inferring the quality of small borrowers. Management Science, 62(6), 1554–1577.
[12] GUO Feng, WANG Jingyi, WANG Fang, KONG Tao, ZHANG Xun, CHENG Zhiyun, “Measuring China’s Digital Financial Inclusion: Index Compilation and Spatial Characteristics”, China Economic Quarterly, 2020,19(4),1401-1418.