Analysis on the Regulation of Order in the Postgraduate Entrance Examination Training Market

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202515315

Author(s)

Kong Fanru

Affiliation(s)

Institute of Government Management, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China

Abstract

In recent years, the rapid expansion of postgraduate entrance examination training institutions, driven by surging market demand, has been accompanied by frequent malpractices such as false advertising, exorbitant fees, and fraudulent instructor qualifications, severely infringing on consumer rights and disrupting the educational market order. This paper systematically analyzes the manifestations of industry irregularities by combining recent high-profile cases and literature research. It explores the root causes from three perspectives: regulatory gaps, information asymmetry, and malicious competition, and proposes governance recommendations, including improving regulations, strengthening dynamic supervision, and promoting industry standardization. the study provides theoretical references for standardizing the postgraduate training market and safeguarding the rights of candidates.

Keywords

Postgraduate Training Institutions; Industry Regulation; False Advertising

References

[1] China Consumers Association. (2024). 2024 Q1 Analysis Report on Complaints in Education and Training Services. Beijing: CCA. [2] Zhang, W. (2023). Governance of Training Industry Under Educational Marketization. Journal of Educational Development Research. [3] Liu, Z. T. (2022). Regulatory Dilemmas and Breakthroughs for Training Institutions in the Context of Educational Marketization. Educational Research. [4] Research. (2021). China Postgraduate Training Industry White Paper 2021. Beijing: iResearch.