Construction of a Dual Closed-Loop Collaborative-Driven Educational Administration Management and Operation Mode from the Perspective of AACSB Accreditation: A Case Study of Shanghai Sanda University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202515420

Author(s)

Haojie Yang

Affiliation(s)

Sanda University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

In the wave of internationalization of higher education, AACSB accreditation has become an important standard for measuring the quality of business education in colleges and universities. Taking Shanghai Shanda University as the research object, this paper focuses on the innovation of educational administration management and operation mode, and deeply explores how to construct a dual closed-loop collaborative-driven educational administration management and operation mode from the perspective of AACSB(The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) accreditation. Through the theoretical analysis and practical path research of the dual closed-loop collaborative-driven mode, this paper reveals how the mode realizes the efficient allocation of teaching resources, the refined management of teaching processes, and the continuous improvement of teaching quality through the collaborative operation of the internal quality assurance closed-loop and the external feedback optimization closed-loop. It provides referenceable practical experience and theoretical reference for colleges and universities to improve their educational administration management systems and enhance educational quality under the AACSB accreditation framework.

Keywords

AACSB (The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business); Closed-Loop Thinking; Educational Administration Management; Continuous Improvement

References

[1]Zhi Junqi. Closed-Loop Thinking. China Friendship Publishing Company. 2019:56-59. [2]Liu Lei, Xu Zhaoheng. The Reform and Enlightenment of AACSB Accreditation Standards from the Perspective of Third-Party Evaluation. Heilongjiang Education (Higher Education Research and Evaluation). 2024(1). [3]Zheng Li, Huang Jinyan. Exploring Best Practices in Business Education by Benchmarking against AACSB International Standards. Scientific Consultation, 2024(13). [4]Zhang Ruina, Wang Yanhua. Path to Realizing Strategic Reform in Business Schools from the Perspective of AACSB Accreditation Index System. Journal of Education of Renmin University of China, 2024(9). [5]Guo Yu, Feng Yong, Gong Dalong. Construction and Practice of Internal Teaching Quality Monitoring and Evaluation System in Colleges and Universities. Higher Education Forum, 2024(1). [6]Wang Juntao. Construction of Teaching Quality Monitoring System in Application-Oriented Undergraduate Universities under the Background of Transformation and Development. The Guide of Science & Education, 2024(4). [7]Zhou Ziye. Research Path of AACSB Business Accreditation Standards in the System Construction of Business Schools. East China Science & Technology, 2023(08). [8]Zhu Junyi. Enlightenment of AACSB Learning Quality Assurance Standards on the Cultivation of New Business Talents. Talents. 2021(6).