Integrating General English with Military English through POA: A Case Study of the “Tactical Hand Signs” Lesson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202615514
Author(s)
Lanlan Du*, Qin Zhang, Rongling Cai, Shuaijuan Zhu
Affiliation(s)
Early Warning Academy, Wuhan, Hubei, China
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
Military English teaching has long faced the dilemma of “separation of learning and application”, where the learning of general English is disconnected from its application in military scenarios. This paper, based on the Production-Oriented Approach (POA) as its theoretical framework, taking the listening and speaking session of the unit Body Language in Communication in New Horizon English Course as an example, explores a listening and speaking instructional design for integrated “General English + Military English”. The study adopts a dual approach of level-clearing task-driven design and the integration of ideological and political education throughout the entire process. It aligns the three stages of POA, namely “Motivating, Enabling, and assessing”, with three task levels. The findings indicate that the “re-contextualization” of General English vocabulary in military contexts is a feasible integration mechanism. The level-clearing mechanism forms a dual-layered motivation system of “macro-motivation + micro-motivation”, and embedding the ideological and political theme into the task itself can avoid the “labeling” type of integration. In general, this study offers a transferable design model for embedding Military English components into the General English teaching stage.
Keywords
Production-Oriented Approach; General English + Military English; Level-Clearing Task-Driven Teaching; Ideological-Political Education; Tactical Hand Signs
References
[1] Xiao Xue, Zhang Hongying, Yang He, et al. An Empirical Study of the “Production-Oriented Approach” in Military English Listening and Speaking Courses. China Military-to-Civilian Conversion, 2025(08): 205-207.
[2] Wang Ying, Hu Yike. Classroom Teaching Reform Practice of Military English Based on the Production-Oriented Approach. English Square, 2023(05): 116-119.
[3] Zhang Wenjuan. An Action Research on the Application of the Production-Oriented Approach. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2022.
[4] Shi Si. Exploration of the Teaching Path of Curriculum Ideological-Political Education in “General English” Courses in Military Academies. Education and Teaching Forum, 2022(40): 168-172.
[5] Zhang Jing, Wang Deli, Zheng Zhen. Online Teaching Practice of Military English under the Guidance of the “Production-Oriented Approach.” Journal of Higher Education Research, 2022, 45(2): 84-90.
[6] Wen Qiufang. The Debate Between General English and Specialized English in College English Teaching: Problems and Solutions. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 2014(01): 1-8.
[7] Pan Guangqin. Practical Research on the EGP+ESP Integrated Teaching Model of Digital Empowerment in Higher Vocational English under the OBE Concept. Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College, 2026, 39(13):194-195+198.
[8] Xin Zhiying, Pang Yutian. Exploration of the Mapping and Integration Path of Ideological-Political Education in Foreign Language Courses. Foreign Languages in China, 2025(1).
[9] Miao Xin, Wang Xinran, Qiao Liang. Ideological-Political Education Practice of Military English Courses Based on the OBE Concept. Military Higher Education Research, 2024, 47(03): 94-99.
[10] Zhang Jing, Zhu Jinsong. Blended Teaching Practice Based on the Ideological-Political Chain: A Case Study of the “Military English” Course. Journal of Higher Education Research, 2023, 46(01): 91-95.