Exploration of Practical Paths for Empowering the Value Shaping of Accounting Courses with Artificial Intelligence
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jike.202504302
Author(s)
Liming Wang*, Qinping Chen, Xiuyan Lin
Affiliation(s)
Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
Under the background of the new era, major universities are committed to promoting a significant issue - how to deeply integrate the value-driven educational concept into the professional teaching system. However, the current traditional teaching model still has the problem that "professional teaching" and "value guidance" have not been fully integrated. Based on this, taking the accounting course as an example, this article proposes a three-in-one implementation path of "intelligent collection, intelligent recognition, intelligent presentation and intelligent evaluation" from the perspective of artificial intelligence technology, to achieve the organic embedding of artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, the article also reveals the challenges of data security and technological reliance during the reform process. This research provides practical guidance for the deep integration of artificial intelligence and value-driven teaching in courses, which has positive significance for promoting the teaching reform of accounting courses and improving teaching quality.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence; Accounting Courses; Implementation Path; Ethical Issues
References
[1] Ren Miaomiao, Sun Yu, Ji Wuxia. The Basic Logic and Risk Prevention of Embedding Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Governance. Teaching and Management, 2024(27):28-33.
[2] Zhang Zhi. ChatGPT/ Generative Artificial Intelligence Reshapes the underlying logic and possible paths of Education. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 2023, 41(7):131-142.
[3] Yuan Yulong, Ma Yanyang, Pang Mingyue. Risk Avoidance of Subjectivity Transfer in Educational Evaluation in the Era of Artificial Intelligenc. Modern Educational Technology, 2023, 33(5):34-40.
[4] Li Zhengtao. The Disruption and Reset of the "Foundation" of Basic Education by ChatGPT/ Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 2023, 41(7):47-55.
[5] Zeng Jianguo, Tang Yao Visualization research and analysis of AI education risk research in China. Journal of Luliang University, 2022, 12 (02): 43-47.
[6] Zhao leilei, Zhang Li, Dai Ruihua Ethics of educational artificial intelligence: basic dimensions and risk elimination. Modern Distance Education, 2021 (05): 73-80.
[7] Zheng shan, zhou haiyin Education risk and its countermeasures from the perspective of uncertainty. Teaching and Management, 2021 (33): 12-15.
[8] Sánchez-Ruiz L M, Moll-López S, Nu~nez-Pérez A,et al. ChatGPT Challenges Blended Learning Methodologies in Engineering Education:A Case Study in Mathematics. Applied Sciences-Basel, 2023, 13(10):6039.
[9] Rudolph J, Tan S, Tan S, et al. ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 2023, 6(1):5-12.
[10] Cai Qingyue, Fan Xinruo Empowerment, Risk and Enabling: How Generative AI Reshapes Basic Education. Education Theory and Practice, 2025, (22):3-9.