Relationship between Vegetation Diversity and Soil Microbial Functional Diversity in Native Mixed-Korean Pine Forests_Vol. 2 No. 2 (JMSD 2025)_Journal of Management and Social Development (ISSN: 3005-5741)

Home > Journal of Management and Social Development (ISSN: 3005-5741) > Vol. 2 No. 2 (JMSD 2025) >

Relationship between Vegetation Diversity and Soil Microbial Functional Diversity in Native Mixed-Korean Pine Forests

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmsd.202512206

Author(s)

Qingming Tang1, Wei Liu2, Yuxuan Ma1, Lei Wang1,*

Affiliation(s)

1Hulun Buir Forestry and Grassland Business Development Center, Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia, China 2No.1 Middle School of Prairie Chenbarhu banner, Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia, China *Corresponding Author

Abstract

Experiments were carried out on a serial of original korean pine forest compared to adjacent artiﬁcial forest. The experimental designed five plots (HD, HZ, HY, LY and BH) of 800 m2. The model contains fifteen factors including diversity and evenness of vegetation and soil microorganism. Using the model, the integrated eco-environmental stability index (ESI) of study area in five forest types were computed. According to the numerical results, the stability of the three original korean pine mixed forest types treatments (HD, HZ and HY) demonstrated signiﬁcantly higher (P <0.05) compared with both the artificial pure forest types (LY and BH).

Keywords

Native Mixed-Korean Pine Forests; Vegetation Diversity; Microbial Diversity; Biolog; Eco-Environmental Stability

References

[1]Alewell, C.,Manderscheid, B., 1998. Use of objective criteria for the assessment of biogeochemical ecosystem models. Ecol. Model. 107 (2–3), 213–224. [2]K.W. Pan, Z.G. Liu, Structures & dynamics of the tree layer of artiﬁcial mixed forests in clear-cut areas of subalpine dark coniferous forests, Chinese Journal Application Environment Biology 4 (4) (1998) 327–334 [3]Liao M, Chen C L, Huang C Y, 2005. Effect of heavy metals on soil microbial activity and diversity in a reclaimed mining wasteland of red soil area[J]. J Environ Sci, 17(5): 832–837. [4]Liu, Z., Xie, Zh.R., 2003. A new method that can improve regional eco-environmental evaluation—combining GIS with AHP. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 12 (2), 163–168 (in Chinese). [5]Li,Ye, Jiang,H.T.,Chen,X.C., 2001.An index-weight determination method for target system of evaluation on treatment installation of environmental pollution. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 23 (12), 51–53 (in Chinese). [6]Loreau, M., Naeem, S., and Inchausti, P. (2002) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [7]Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P et al., 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges[J]. Science, 294: 804–808 [8]McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P.M., and Morin, P.J. (1997) Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature390: 162–165. [9]McNaughton, S.J. (1997) Diversity and stability of ecological communities: a comment on the role of empiricism in ecology. Am Nat 111: 515–525. [10]Miki T, Kondoh M (2002) Feedbacks between nutrient cycling and vegetation predict plant species coexistence and invasion. Ecol Lett 5:624–633.